George Roach Litigation Consulting
Your Subtitle text
Page 3


Each article listings is linked to a pdf copy of the article:


Measuring Damages and Remedies

Compensation Forfeiture: Stacking Remedies Against Disloyal Agents and Employees  (exposure draft Sept 9,2015, accepted for publication by St. Mary's Law Journal)

The Comprehensive Guide to Lost Profits and Other Commercial Damages, ed. Nancy J. Fannon and Jonathan M. Dunitz, Business Valuation Resources, Third Edition (2014)

Chapter 28. Introduction to Equitable Remedies

Chapter 29. Counting the Beans: Unjust Enrichment and the Defendant’s Overhead (reprint)

Chapter 30. Restitution Rollout: The Restatement (Third) of Restitution & Unjust Enrichment: Counter-Restitution for Monetary Remedies in Equity (reprint) 

Rescission in Texas, A Suspect Remedy, The Review of Litigation (Summer 2012), 31 Rev. Litig. 494

Measuring Business Damages In Fraudulent Inducement Cases, Houston Business & Tax Law Journal (Fall 2011)

Counting the Beans: Unjust Enrichment and Defendant’s Overhead, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Spring,  2008,    ( 16 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 483). 

Damages is the ‘Gatekeeper’ Issue for the Federal Computer Fraud & Abuse Act, Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, Spring, 2006, 8 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 61 (co-authored with William Michiels)

Correcting Uncertain Prophecies: An Analysis of Business Consequential Damages, The Review  of Litigation Winter, 2003, 22 Rev. Litig. 1

What Kind of Liabilities Are You Assuming?  The Reasonable Equivalent Value of Assumed Liabilities, Texas Journal of Business Law Spring, 1998.

The Law of Remedies in Equity


Texas Remedies in Equity for Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Disgorgement, Forfeiture and Fracturing, St. Mary’s Law Journal, Volume 45, Number3 (2014), p. 367-489 

Unjust Enrichment in Texas: Is It A Floor Wax or a Dessert Topping?, Baylor Law Review, Volume 65, Number 1 (2013), p. 153-254

Counter-Restitution for Monetary Remedies in Equity, Washington & Lee Law Review, Vol. 68, No.3, page 1271 (Fall 2011)

How Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Can Improve Your Corporate Claim.  The Review of Litigation.  Spring, 2007, 26 Rev. Litig.  265

A Default Rule of Omnipotence: Implied Jurisdiction and Exaggerated Remedies in Equity For Federal Agencies, Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, Winter 2006, 12 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 1

Business and Other Articles

Texas Supreme Court Revisits Professional Goodwill, Texas Bar Association Family Law Reporter Spring, 1998.

A Business Appraiser's Model for Separating Professional and Personal Goodwill, FairShare The Matrimonial Law Monthly August, 1998.


Control Premiums and Strategic Mergers, Business Valuation Review June 1998.


A Mistaken Assumption that Reduces Commercial Goodwill, FairShare The Matrimonial Law Monthly February, 1999.

Control Premiums and Strategic Mergers, 1989 to 2002, Business Valuation Review Volume 22, No. 1 (March, 2003)


CEO Compensation in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Compensation and Benefits Review October, 2003, 66- 81 (co-authored with Alan Goedde)


Multi-Discipline Practice


A Firm Grasp of Business, Legal Times November, 2000.


The Substantive Synergy of Multidisciplinary Practices, National Bar Association Magazine May/June 2001.


Dated Exposure Drafts:

Reasonable (Not Rational) Royalties, (exposure draft)


Unjust Enrichment For Violations of the Automatic Stay (exposure draft)


Website Builder